Translation alone does not create legal alignment. Teams working in compliance workflows need to see not just what to do — but which article requires it and why.
EAB links every governance step, obligation area, and evidence requirement to its legal source — so compliance is connected to the law, not separated from it.
Compliance teams should not need to look up EU AI Act articles in a separate browser tab. Legal source context belongs inside the workflow — as reference, not noise.
Each obligation area in EAB is linked to its EU AI Act article source. When a team completes a governance step, the legal basis is visible inline — not in a separate document or external legal database.
When the platform asks for evidence — technical documentation, oversight records, risk management records — the legal source of the requirement is shown. Teams understand why the evidence is needed, not just what to upload.
Audit exports include the legal source mapping for each governance step. Regulators and auditors see not just what the organisation did, but which article required it — without manual annotation of the exported record.
Legal context is available in German and English. For organisations working in German regulatory environments, the official German language version of EU AI Act provisions is accessible alongside the English reference.
When AI Screening produces a risk classification, the legal criteria that produced it are visible — which risk category criteria applied, which articles define the category, and what the classification means for obligations.
As EU AI Act implementation guidance is published, legal context in the platform is updated. Teams see current legal interpretation — not static article text from the initial regulation publication.
Legal source mapping is not a reference layer alongside the platform. It is embedded in the governance record — visible in every workflow step and present in every audit export.
When AI Screening generates a risk classification, the applicable EU AI Act risk category criteria are shown inline — with article references. The classification is not a label; it is a legally grounded governance decision.
Each item in the obligation set is linked to its legal source. Compliance teams working through obligations see which article requires each step — so governance actions are grounded in the law, not in platform instructions alone.
When evidence is required — for oversight documentation, technical documentation, or risk management — the legal source of the requirement is visible. Teams upload evidence understanding what it supports legally.
Audit exports include the legal source for each governance step and obligation area. Regulators reviewing the record see not just the compliance state — but the legal basis for every governance decision in the record.
Every governance step in EAB is linked to its EU AI Act source. Legal context is part of the workflow, not separate from it.
EU-hosted · Anchored to CELEX 32024R1689
Tell us about your organization and what you’re looking to address. We’ll follow up with the relevant information.
