EAB is the only AI governance software that turns EU AI Act requirements into a controlled, fully auditable decision process. Every AI system is registered, every risk is screened, responsibilities and evidence are recorded, and decisions are automatically re‑screened whenever the law evolves. Built in Munich, EU‑hosted and anchored to CELEX 32024R1689, EAB keeps your AI governance aligned with European law.
Register AI systems, screen risk, assign responsibility, document evidence, approve decisions and re‑screen automatically when legal sources change — all in one governed platform.
EAB turns EU AI Act compliance into a governed approval process: every AI system is screened before approval, responsibilities are assigned, evidence is documented, and every decision remains reconstructable.
Every AI system is screened before approval can move forward. EAB surfaces risk signals, missing context, and legally relevant review points inside the workflow, so Supervisors never approve blind.
Business users, AI System Owners, technical reviewers, and Supervisors work from one governed record. Responsibilities, open items, evidence gaps, and approval decisions are assigned to the right role.
AI systems can be re-screened when legal context, system usage, evidence, or operational conditions change. EAB keeps prior decisions visible while new review needs become actionable.
Every approval, rejection, return, override, screening run, and relevant change is logged with user attribution, timestamp, and justification, creating a reconstructable record for governance teams and auditors.
When a regulator asks, “Show me how you concluded that this system was not high‑risk — and under which version of the law,” most organizations cannot reconstruct the answer.
EAB turns that answer into part of the decision record by default.
Organizations deploying high-risk AI systems under Annex III must be compliant by 2 August 2026. The screening records, obligation evidence, and approval trails that regulators will request need to exist now — not after the audit letter arrives.
A screening result is never the final decision. It becomes structured input into a human‑governed approval process — with documented responsibility, legal‑source anchoring, explicit applicability, and full reconstructability.
Static PDFs and spreadsheet checklists describe the law at some moment in time. EAB anchors each decision to the legal source context that informed it.
When auditors ask, “Who approved this?”, the trail often ends in email threads and memory. EAB records the role, the named user, and the timestamp behind every approval.
A blank field is not a compliance position. EAB records non-applicability as an explicit, justified decision — not as silence.
Regulators review decisions in retrospect. EAB preserves the same decision context that existed at the time of approval — including legal source, screening record, responsibility, and evidence.
EAB does not treat AI compliance as a checklist. It turns every AI system into a governed decision record: registered, screened, assigned, evidenced, approved, and reconstructable.
Every AI system starts as a named, owned object.
Operator describes purpose, deployment context, ownership, and technical scope using structured intake. The registry entry is the anchor for everything downstream.
High-risk AI classification anchored to the law — not an opinion.
Every system is screened against the EU AI Act, with the result anchored to a specific legal source version. When the law changes, the re-screening queue activates automatically.
Who is responsible — and for what — is never ambiguous.
The platform identifies your organisation’s role under Art. 2 & 3 (provider, deployer, importer) and resolves the obligation set that follows. Each obligation is either evidenced or documented as non-applicable.
A named author. A sealed record.
Business Operator, AI System Owner, and Supervisor work through structured gates. The final approval is signed, timestamped, and content-hashed — reconstructable years later.
When an auditor or regulator asks how you classified that system, who approved it, and under which version of the law — EAB produces the answer as a structured record, not a narrative.
Not a spreadsheet row. Not a paragraph in a PDF. A structured governance object that connects context, screening, obligations, approval, evidence, and legal source anchoring in one reconstructable record.
The operator records purpose, ownership, deployment context, and business use before review begins.
EAB creates a structured screening result with risk signals, missing context, and legal-source context.
The Obligation Matrix shows what applies, what remains unclear, and what has been documented as not applicable.
The Supervisor approves, rejects, returns, or escalates through a role-based gate with named responsibility.
The decision is preserved with source context, timestamp, user attribution, evidence state, and integrity record.
Three roles operate in parallel through structured gates — with a read-only auditor lane that can reconstruct every step.
EAB modules share the same decision objects, role model, evidence layer, and audit record. Adding a module does not duplicate work — it extends the same governed record.
The operative core for AI governance. Screening, risk classification, obligation logic, evidence readiness, approvals, and re-screening are anchored to a specific legal source context.
Data protection governance operates inside the same record where AI decisions are made. Processing activities, DPIA logic, TOM profiles, vendor context, and AI-system links remain connected instead of being documented twice.
Cybersecurity governance is connected to the same responsibility, evidence, and audit logic. NIS2 measures, incident workflows, supplier context, and management accountability extend the platform record instead of creating a separate compliance silo.
EAB is built for organizations where AI use cannot remain informal: regulated teams, compliance-heavy operations, and multi-entity groups that need one reconstructable governance record instead of scattered documents.
“We need to prove how the system was classified, which obligations applied, and who approved it before deployment.”
“Patient safety is regulated. So is the reasoning behind why this AI system is in scope, out of scope, or subject to additional review.”
“Twelve subsidiaries, four jurisdictions, one executive view of AI governance.”
EAB is built for decisions that must be reconstructed later — not for documents that look complete today but fail under audit.
Every decision record preserves the legal source context that informed it — including screening snapshot, source reference, and decision integrity. Later amendments do not rewrite earlier decisions.
When the AI Act, GDPR, or NIS2 context changes, affected systems can enter a re-screening queue with explicit role ownership and follow-up action. Compliance becomes an operating process, not a one-time file.
Excluded obligations are not left as empty fields. EAB records non-applicability as an explicit, justified statement with named author, role, and reasoning.
Spreadsheets, GRC suites, generic AI assistants, ticketing systems, and document repositories may each support part of the work. None of them produces one reconstructable AI Act decision record.
EAB is developed with experienced data protection officers, legal specialists, academic experts, and enterprise technology leaders who understand how regulatory obligations become operational systems.
Founder · Managing Director
Combines founder-level strategic leadership with direct ownership of platform architecture and execution. Drives EAB's business model, product direction, and institutional positioning while building trusted relationships across commercial, legal, audit, and policy environments.
LinkedIn →
Co-Founder · EU Law & Compliance Integrity
Internationally recognized authority in data protection, AI regulation, and cross-border legal governance. Ensures that EAB's compliance tools, audit protocols, and documentation systems are fully aligned with the EU AI Act — both in legal interpretation and institutional applicability.
LinkedIn →
Chief Legal Officer
Safeguards EAB's legal architecture, investor readiness, and compliance integrity across emerging technologies. With expertise in AI law, GDPR, blockchain, fintech, and legal informatics, she translates complex regulation into actionable frameworks that set a benchmark for legally sustainable and ethically resilient AI adoption.
LinkedIn →
Chief Revenue Officer
Drives EAB's revenue architecture, institutional partnerships, and go-to-market dynamics. With deep expertise in ecosystem growth and trust-driven sales, expands EAB's presence across regulated industries, public-private initiatives, and pan-European compliance markets.
LinkedIn →EAB is expanding a curated network of qualified auditors and domain experts who can represent the platform with credibility, precision, and regulatory seriousness across Europe.
We work with certified auditors, data protection officers, IT security specialists, legal experts, and AI governance practitioners — not a generic partner list, but a curated network for professionals who can deliver legally aligned AI compliance.
We’re building Europe’s leading infrastructure for AI Act certification. Submit your details below and our team will contact you shortly.
EAB tiers are not separated by artificial feature scarcity, but by governance maturity.
All plans activate immediately via Stripe. No setup, no sales call required. Upgrade when your organization is ready.
Structured compliance record. AI system registry, screening, and point-in-time decision record — without complex workflows.
Start SmallBiz →Operational governance workflow. Role-based approvals, re-screening queue, obligation matrix, and evidence readiness — all in one record.
Start Professional →Assurance-grade governance. Auditor workspace, executive cockpit, multi-entity control, and all three regulation modules included.
Start Enterprise →A short version of the most common procurement questions. The full set lives on the pricing page.
Start in minutes. Upgrade when your organization is ready.
Not sure which plan fits? Talk to us.
Tell us about your organization and what you’re looking to address. We’ll follow up with the relevant information.
