AI governance needs a defined path — from first registration through continuous compliance. Fragmented controls cannot produce a defensible governance record.
EAB connects every governance step into one auditable flow: structured, role-separated, and traceable from intake to approval and beyond.
Each step in the EAB governance flow feeds the next. The result is a single auditable record that can be shown to regulators, auditors, or leadership at any point.
Every AI system is registered with structured context — name, purpose, deployment, and ownership. Governance cannot begin without a registry. The AI System Registry is the entry point for the entire flow.
Actor Role Assessment and the AI Act Classification Wizard determine the organisation's role under the Act and the applicable risk level. The assessment is documented and feeds the obligation set.
AI Screening generates structured risk signals, classification context, and obligation input. The screening result becomes part of the decision basis for the supervisor approval that follows — attributed, timestamped, and legally anchored.
Technical documentation, human oversight records, literacy evidence, and risk management records are built and tracked per obligation. Evidence gaps surface before approval — not during audit.
Supervisor approval seals the governance record at the moment of sign-off. The approval captures the evidence state, the screening result, and the decision reasoning. Retroactive modification is not possible.
Legal change monitoring, re-screening triggers, and evidence drift detection keep compliance live after approval. The governance record is not frozen — it reflects the current state of every system at all times.
When governance steps are fragmented across tools, emails, and spreadsheets, the connections between them are lost. EAB makes the connections structural.
When a system is registered and ownership is assigned, it enters the screening intake automatically. No export, no copy-paste, no manual hand-off. The governance chain begins at registration.
The screening result determines which obligations apply. Evidence requirements, documentation checklists, and oversight mechanisms are generated from the screening — not manually assembled by the compliance team.
The supervisor receives a complete governance package — not a request to review scattered documents. Evidence gaps are visible before the approval request is submitted. Approval is informed, not blind.
After approval, the system enters continuous governance. The approved state is the baseline. Changes — in the system, in the law, in the evidence — are measured against it. Compliance is maintained as a live record.
Each step in the governance flow produces a structured, timestamped artifact. The chain of custody behind those artifacts — roles, gates, states, and handoffs — is documented in detail.
See the full governance chain of custody →Six connected steps. One governance record. From first registration to continuous compliance — built for audit pressure from day one.
EU-hosted · Anchored to CELEX 32024R1689
Tell us about your organization and what you’re looking to address. We’ll follow up with the relevant information.
