One-time compliance breaks down when systems change, legal context shifts, or obligations are re-interpreted. Governance must remain live.
EAB keeps AI compliance active through legal change monitoring, re-screening triggers, evidence drift detection, and ongoing obligation tracking.
Systems change. Laws are re-interpreted. Evidence becomes stale. Obligations that were met at approval may not be met six months later. Continuous compliance tracks what point-in-time reviews cannot.
EAB monitors EU AI Act implementation updates, regulatory guidance, and obligation re-interpretations. When legal context changes in ways that affect registered systems, the impact is surfaced as a governance action.
System changes — in purpose, scope, data inputs, or deployment context — can change the risk classification and applicable obligations. EAB detects material changes and triggers re-screening when necessary.
Evidence that was complete at approval may become incomplete over time — expired certifications, rotated staff, changed oversight arrangements. EAB tracks evidence validity and surfaces drift before audit.
Obligation coverage is tracked as a live state, not a point-in-time snapshot. When a covered obligation becomes uncovered — due to evidence expiry or system change — it surfaces immediately as an open gap.
Every material system change is logged and linked to its compliance impact. Organisations can show regulators not just the current state — but how compliance was maintained through every change event.
The audit trail is not a snapshot at approval. It is a continuous record of governance actions — re-screenings, evidence updates, legal change responses, supervisor re-approvals — across the full system lifecycle.
Continuous compliance is built into the EAB governance flow — not a separate monitoring tool, but the natural lifecycle of every governed AI system.
Initial screening produces a risk classification, obligation set, and evidence record. Supervisor approval closes the first compliance cycle. This is the baseline — not the end state.
EAB monitors for legal context changes and system modifications. When a change has compliance impact, the affected systems are flagged. Organisations see what changed, why it matters, and what action is required.
Material changes trigger a structured re-assessment — re-screening, evidence refresh, or obligation re-mapping. The governance record is updated. The change event and the response are both documented.
The governance record always reflects the current compliance state — and the history of how it was maintained. Organisations can show auditors not just that a system is compliant, but how compliance was sustained over time.
One-time reviews are not enough for operational AI governance. EAB maintains compliance as a live record — through legal change, system change, and audit pressure.
EU-hosted · Anchored to CELEX 32024R1689
Tell us about your organization and what you’re looking to address. We’ll follow up with the relevant information.
