Leadership cannot govern what it cannot see. Portfolio-level AI compliance requires a command view — not access to individual system records.
EAB's Executive Governance Cockpit turns system-level records into portfolio-level governance intelligence — for mandanten_admins, supervisors, and leadership stakeholders.
Leadership stakeholders need governance signals — not system details. EAB aggregates individual system records into portfolio-level compliance visibility.
Total registered systems, screened systems, approved systems, and systems with open governance gaps. The portfolio view shows where the organisation stands across its entire AI footprint.
Each system has a compliance health signal — based on screening status, evidence completeness, obligation coverage, and approval state. Leadership sees which systems are governed, which have gaps, and which are at risk.
Every approval, rejection, and re-assessment decision is visible in the decision log — with the responsible supervisor, the decision date, and the system affected. Leadership can see who is accountable for each governance decision.
Pending supervisor approvals and overdue re-screenings surface as actionable items. Governance does not stall silently — delays are visible at leadership level as well as at supervisor level.
How many high-risk, limited-risk, and minimal-risk systems exist in the portfolio. How many high-risk systems are fully governed. Risk distribution informs resourcing and governance priority decisions.
Different stakeholders need different views. Supervisors see their approval queue. Admins see the full portfolio. Leadership sees the aggregate governance picture. Each view is scoped to what is actionable for that role.
The cockpit is not a static dashboard — it reflects the live governance state. As systems are screened, approved, and updated, the portfolio view updates.
As systems are registered and ownership is established, they appear in the cockpit. Unregistered or unowned systems surface as portfolio-level gaps — not just individual system issues.
Every screening completion, approval decision, and re-assessment event updates the portfolio health signal. Leadership sees governance progress — not just a count of registered systems.
When evidence expires or obligation coverage decreases, the portfolio health degrades. Leadership sees the governance state accurately — not a frozen snapshot from the last approval event.
Every governance decision is attributed. Leadership can see which supervisors made which decisions, on which systems, and when. Accountability is structural — visible at portfolio level, not just in individual records.
Portfolio-level compliance visibility — without requiring leadership to navigate individual system records. Governance intelligence at the level where decisions are made.
EU-hosted · Anchored to CELEX 32024R1689
Tell us about your organization and what you’re looking to address. We’ll follow up with the relevant information.
